Racialicious is a blog about the intersection of race and pop culture. Check out our updates on the latest celebrity gaffes, our no-holds-barred critique of questionable media representations. If you've been on the blog, you know how this Tumblr works, too. Including the moderation policy.
Recent Tweets @racialicious

Grace Lee Boggs, the 97-year-old feminist, activist, and philosopher, was born in the United Stated in 1915 to Chinese immigrant parents. Boggs earned her PhD in 1940; these credentials were no shield against discrimination based on her Chinese ancestry. When Boggs married African American activist James Boggs, over a decade before the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage, she made the choice to add his name to her own. Their marriage would last until James Boggs’ death 40 years later.

In observing debates around the politics of naming, especially when it comes to gender, I often think of Boggs. Someone who knows little of her life and politics, or of intersectionality, might judge Boggs’ last name as an acceptance of a patriarchal naming tradition that privileges men. But is it?

The argument could also be made that by adding the last name of her black husband to her own Chinese name Boggs was putting into personal action the political solidarity between people of color traditionally pitted against one another by white supremacy. Perhaps her acceptance of the name was even a revolutionary act that flew in the face of the laws of a country that said race must determine whom you choose to love?

Or maybe, in 1953, a deeply political Chinese American woman marrying a black man simply had bigger fish to fry than worrying about her last name? Of course, these arguments are just as much speculation as the first. Still, I’d argue it is Boggs’ life-long record as a thought leader in the labor, civil rights, women’s rights, and environmental justice movements that actually defines her identity.

Boggs put into action hooks’ concept of ideas over identity long before the rest of us even started talking about it. That’s an example that could do us all some good.

—In all of the recent controversy about what women should and shouldn’t be doing with our last names, I think Dr. Sarah Jackson echoes my sentiment. Check out what she said on the R today!
  1. swannskies reblogged this from ladysingsfolsomblues
  2. ladysingsfolsomblues reblogged this from racialicious
  3. restimar reblogged this from racialicious
  4. moderntimesbookstore reblogged this from racialicious
  5. faithfulimage reblogged this from oppressedbrowngirlsdoingthings
  6. thebrigeedaspooks reblogged this from bibliophilebetty
  7. bibliophilebetty reblogged this from theyalwayswantyoutoproveit
  8. theyalwayswantyoutoproveit reblogged this from coorio
  9. lonelylilvampire reblogged this from racialicious
  10. forochel reblogged this from oppressedbrowngirlsdoingthings
  11. blooming-white-tea reblogged this from oppressedbrowngirlsdoingthings
  12. higheee reblogged this from susurrations
  13. yellowgen reblogged this from peaceshannon
  14. quantumspork reblogged this from oppressedbrowngirlsdoingthings
  15. lioninthemaking reblogged this from peaceshannon
  16. parchedvisions reblogged this from mariahoenenevigglad
  17. mariahoenenevigglad reblogged this from susurrations
  18. scienceweasels reblogged this from oppressedbrowngirlsdoingthings
  19. nothingcutenothingclever reblogged this from peaceshannon